@article{bib1,
	title = {Latin America’s longstanding open access ecosystem could be undermined by proposals from the Global North [LSE Latin America and Caribbean]},
	url = {https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/latamcaribbean/2019/11/06/latin-americas-longstanding-open-access-ecosystem-could-be-undermined-by-proposals-from-the-global-north/},
	author = {Aguado-López, E and Becerril-García, A},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{bib2,
	journal = {Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry},
	title = {The open access mandate: be careful what you wish for},
	volume = {53},
	author = {Agustini, B and Berk, M},
	pages = {1044--1046},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{bib3,
	journal = {Australian Quarterly},
	title = {Open access: should one model ever fit all?},
	volume = {90},
	author = {Barbour, G and Nicholls, S},
	pages = {3--9},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{bib4,
	journal = {Science},
	title = {Scientific societies worry about threat from plan S},
	volume = {363},
	author = {Brainard, J},
	pages = {332--333},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{bib5,
	journal = {PeerJ},
	title = {Plan S in Latin America: a precautionary note},
	volume = {7},
	author = {Debat, H and Babini, D},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{bib6,
	journal = {Biophysical Reviews},
	title = {Plan S for publishing science in an open access way: not everyone is likely to be happy},
	volume = {11},
	author = {Gómez-Fernández, JC},
	pages = {841--842},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{bib7,
	journal = {New England Journal of Medicine},
	title = {No free lunch - What price Plan S for scientific publishing?},
	volume = {380},
	author = {Haug, CJ},
	pages = {1181--1185},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{bib8,
	journal = {Quantitative Science Studies},
	title = {Comparison of bibliographic data sources: implications for the robustness of university rankings},
	volume = {13},
	author = {Huang, CK and Neylon, C and Brookes-Kenworthy, C and Hosking, R and Montgomery, L and Wilson, K and Ozaygen, A},
	pages = {1--34},
	date = {2020},
	year = {2020},
}

@article{bib9,
	title = {Evaluating institutional open access performance: sensitivity analysis},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3696857},
	author = {Huang, C-K and Neylon, C and Hosking, R and Montgomery, L and Wilson, K and Ozaygen, A and Brookes-Kenworthy, C},
	date = {2020},
	year = {2020},
}

@article{bib10,
	title = {Data and intermediate queries for: evaluating institutional open access performance: methodology, challenges and assessment},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3693221},
	author = {Huang, C-K and Neylon, C and Hosking, R and Brookes-Kenworthy, C and Wilson, K and Montgomery, L},
	date = {2020},
	year = {2020},
}

@article{bib11,
	title = {Jupyter notebooks for the article: evaluating institutional open access performance: methodology, challenges and assessment},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3716063},
	author = {Huang, C-K and Neylon, C and Hosking, R and Brookes-Kenworthy, C and Montgomery, L and Wilson, K and Ozaygen, A},
	date = {2020},
	year = {2020},
}

@article{bib12,
	journal = {PLOS ONE},
	title = {Low income countries have the highest percentages of open access publication: a systematic computational analysis of the biomedical literature},
	volume = {14},
	author = {Iyandemye, J and Thomas, MP},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{bib13,
	journal = {Nature},
	title = {Do authors comply when funders enforce open access to research?},
	volume = {562},
	author = {Larivière, V and Sugimoto, CR},
	pages = {483--486},
	date = {2018},
	year = {2018},
}

@article{bib14,
	title = {RCUK open access block grant allocation 2013-18},
	url = {https://figshare.com/articles/RCUK_open_access_block_grant_allocation_201317/4047315},
	author = {Lawson, S},
	date = {2018},
	year = {2018},
}

@article{bib15,
	journal = {PNAS},
	title = {Opinion: "Plan S" falls short for society publishers-and for the researchers they serve},
	volume = {116},
	author = {McNutt, M},
	pages = {2400--2403},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{bib16,
	journal = {Scientometrics},
	title = {The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis},
	volume = {106},
	author = {Mongeon, P and Paul-Hus, A},
	pages = {213--228},
	date = {2016},
	year = {2016},
}

@article{bib17,
	publisher = {Reinventing Universities. MIT Press Work in Progress},
	title = {Open Knowledge Institutions},
	author = {Montgomery, L and Hartley, J and Neylon, C and Gillies, M and Gray, E and Herrmann-Pillath, C and Huang, C-K and Leach, J and Potts, J and Ren, X and Skinner, K and Sugimoto, CR and Wilson, K},
	date = {2018},
	year = {2018},
}

@article{bib18,
	journal = {Canadian Journal of Higher Education},
	title = {The SciELO open access: a gold way from the south},
	volume = {39},
	author = {Packer, AL},
	pages = {111--126},
	date = {2009},
	year = {2009},
}

@article{bib19,
	journal = {PeerJ},
	title = {The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles},
	volume = {6},
	author = {Piwowar, H and Priem, J and Larivière, V and Alperin, JP and Matthias, L and Norlander, B and Farley, A and West, J and Haustein, S},
	date = {2018},
	year = {2018},
}

@article{bib20,
	journal = {bioRxiv},
	title = {The future of OA: a large-scale analysis projecting open access publication and readership},
	author = {Piwowar, H and Priem, J and Orr, R},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{bib21,
	journal = {Science},
	title = {The world debates open-access mandates},
	volume = {363},
	author = {Rabesandratana, T},
	pages = {11--12},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{bib22,
	journal = {arXiv},
	title = {Indicators of open access for universities},
	url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.03840},
	author = {Robinson-Garcia, N and Costas, R and van Leeuwen, TN},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{bib23,
	journal = {arXiv},
	title = {State of open access penetration in universities worldwide},
	url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12273},
	author = {Robinson-Garcia, N and Costas, R and van Leeuwen, TN},
	date = {2020},
	year = {2020},
}

@article{bib24,
	journal = {PeerJ},
	title = {Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research},
	volume = {6},
	author = {Siler, K and Haustein, S and Smith, E and Larivière, V and Alperin, JP},
	date = {2018},
	year = {2018},
}

@article{bib25,
	title = {An overview of microsoft academic service (MAS) and applications},
	author = {Sinha, A and Shen, Z and Song, Y and Ma, H and Eide, D and Hsu, B-J and Wang, K},
	pages = {243--246},
	date = {2015},
	year = {2015},
}

@article{bib26,
	journal = {Nature},
	title = {Indonesia tops open access publishing charts},
	volume = {1},
	author = {Van Noorden, R},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

@article{bib27,
	journal = {Aslib Journal of Information Management},
	title = {The state and evolution of gold open access: a country and discipline level analysis},
	volume = {70},
	author = {Wang, X and Cui, Y and Xu, S and Hu, Z},
	pages = {573--584},
	date = {2018},
	year = {2018},
}

@article{bib28,
	journal = {Frontiers in Big Data},
	title = {A review of Microsoft Academic Services for science of science studies},
	volume = {2},
	author = {Wang, K and Shen, Z and Huang, C and Wu, C-H and Eide, D and Dong, Y and Qian, J and Kanakia, A and Chen, A and Rogahn, R},
	date = {2019},
	year = {2019},
}

