# Exposure to landscape fire smoke reduced birthweight in low- and middle-income countries: findings from a siblings-matched case-control study

1. Jiajianghui Li 1
2. Tianjia Guan 2
3. Qian Guo 3
4. Guannan Geng 4
5. Huiyu Wang 1
6. Fuyu Guo 1
7. Jiwei Li 5
8. Tao Xue txue@hsc.pku.edu.cn 1

1. Institute of Reproductive and Child Health / Ministry of Health Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Centre
2. Department of Health Policy, School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
3. School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology
4. School of Environment, Tsinghua University
5. College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University

2021-09-29

- Research Article

- Epidemiology and Global Health

- child health
- wildfire
- climate change
- maternal health
- Human

- publisher-id 69298
- doi 10.7554/eLife.69298
- elocation-id e69298

## Abstract

Landscape fire smoke (LFS) has been associated with reduced birthweight, but evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is rare.

Here, we present a sibling-matched case–control study of 227,948 newborns to identify an association between fire-sourced fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and birthweight in 54 LMICs from 2000 to 2014. We selected mothers from the geocoded Demographic and Health Survey with at least two children and valid birthweight records. Newborns affiliated with the same mother were defined as a family group. Gestational exposure to LFS was assessed in each newborn using the concentration of fire-sourced PM2.5. We determined the associations of the within-group variations in LFS exposure with birthweight differences between matched siblings using a fixed-effects regression model. Additionally, we analyzed the binary outcomes of low birthweight (LBW) or very low birthweight (VLBW).

According to fully adjusted models, a 1 µg/m3 increase in the concentration of fire-sourced PM2.5 was significantly associated with a 2.17 g (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56–3.77) reduction in birthweight, a 2.80% (95% CI 0.97–4.66) increase in LBW risk, and an 11.68% (95% CI 3.59–20.40) increase in VLBW risk.

Our findings indicate that gestational exposure to LFS harms fetal health.

PKU-Baidu Fund, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Peking University Health Science Centre, and CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences.

## Introduction

The natural cycle of landscape fires (e.g., wildfires, tropical deforestation fires, and agricultural biomass burning) plays an important role in maintaining the terrestrial ecosystem. Yet, landscape fire smoke (LFS) triggers a costly and growing global public health problem 33 Werf et al.2010. The frequency and intensity of landscape fire events have tended to increase 7 Cascio 2018 32 Turetsky et al.2010, driven by interactions between human activities (e.g., slash and slave agriculture) and climate change 11 Hantson et al.2015. Most emissions originate from fires located in tropical rainforests and savannas, where they cause recurrent episodes of severe ambient pollution that affect mainly low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) 33 Werf et al.2010. Worldwide concern regarding large-scale natural forest burning has sparked increasing interest in the harmful effects of LFS exposure on human health.

LFS is composed of hundreds of combustion products, such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 22 Matz et al.2020. Particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5) is one of the most widely studied pollutants derived from LFS. The 24 hr average PM2.5 concentrations on burning days can be many times higher than those on normal days, and the peak level of ambient exposure can persist for several weeks 2 Barn et al.2016. Several epidemiological studies have shown adverse effects of LFS exposure on human health. The majority of the study outcomes involved morbidity and mortality caused by acute respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, particularly among vulnerable individuals, such as children and the elderly 10 Delfino et al.2009 16 Johnston et al.2012 23 Morgan et al.2010. However, the health impacts of LFS on susceptible pregnant women, another highly vulnerable group due to gestation-related physiological changes, such as an increased breathing rate during pregnancy 17 Kolarzyk et al.2005, are not thoroughly discussed. Previous studies have shown that gestational exposure to air pollutants, including those derived from LFS and other emissions, is associated with abnormal placental vascular function and, consequently, low birthweight (LBW) 27 Pedersen et al.2013, preterm birth 26 Padula et al.2019, and small for gestational age 4 Bijnens et al.2016. Exposure to air pollution induces subclinical disorders, such as inflammation, oxidative stress, increased blood viscosity, mitochondrial methylation, and hypoxia 15 Janssen et al.2015 18 Lee et al.2004, which renders the association between LFS and adverse maternal outcomes biologically plausible.

Birth weight comprehensively reflects the intrauterine environment quality, fetal growth, and maternal nutritional status. Therefore, LBW is a global public health problem. LBW neonates are at higher risk for a range of diseases in later life (e.g., early growth retardation and adulthood cardiorespiratory diseases) compared with normal newborns 14 Hviid and Melbye 2007 29 Samaras et al.2003. The estimated worldwide prevalence of LBW was 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.4–17.1) in 2015, compared with 17.5% (95% CI 14.1–21.3) in 2000 5 Blencowe et al.2019. Although some progress has been made in reducing LBW globally, the average annual reduction rate is insufficient to achieve the 2025 WHO global target 35 World Health organization 2017. Additionally, the relevant burden of LBW is unequally distributed in the world as 91% of LBW infants are from LMICs, particularly from Southern Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa 5 Blencowe et al.2019.

All risk factors for adverse birth outcomes should be screened thoroughly to protect maternal and infant health. In addition to conventional factors, such as nutrition and maternal condition, environmental factors, including ambient PM2.5 exposure, also contribute to a considerable global burden of adverse birth outcomes 21 Malley et al.2017. Although a growing number of studies have suggested the deleterious effects of urban air pollution on LBW 20 Li et al.2020 19 Li et al.2017, the exposure–response function specifically for fire-sourced PM2.5 has been insufficiently studied. Furthermore, studies concerning the association between LFS and birthweight have focused primarily on high-income countries, and their conclusions have been inconsistent 1 Abdo et al.2019 6 Silva et al.2014 13 Holstius et al.2012 25 O’Donnell and Behie 2015. As most landscape fires occur in LMICs (Figure 1), studies to assess the relevant health impacts of LFS among residents of such countries are warranted. Hence, we explored the association between birthweight and fire-sourced PM2.5 in 54 LMICs using a sibling-matched case–control study from 2000 to 2014, which was based on a series of global surveys.

General setup

    library(ggplot2)
    library(ggsci)
    load("Fig-1-source-data.RData")
    load("Fig-2-source-data.RData")
    load("Fig-3-source-data.RData")
    load("Fig-4-source-data.RData")

Figure 1.

    ggplot(data=fire_map)+
      geom_tile(aes(x=lon,y=lat,fill=val))+
      scale_fill_material("deep-orange",name=expression(atop('Fire-sourced',PM[2.5]~(mu~g/m^3))),breaks=seq(5,30,5))+
      geom_polygon(data=world_map,aes(x=long,y=lat,group=group),col="grey70",fill=NA,alpha=0,size=0.3)+
      theme_void()+
      geom_point(data=geo_rate,aes(x=lon,y=lat,size=val),shape=1,col="navy")+
      scale_size(breaks=c(0,5,10,20,30),labels=c("5 -","5 ~ 10","10 ~ 20","20 ~ 30","30 +"),name="Rate (per 1000) of\nvery low birthweight (< 1500 g)\namong the analyzed samples")+
      scale_x_continuous(expand=c(0,0))+
      scale_y_continuous(limits=c(-60,84))+
      theme(legend.position=c(0.01,0.01),legend.justification =c(0,0),legend.box = "vertical")+
      guides(size=guide_legend(override.aes = list(shape=1),order = 3),
             fill=guide_legend(order=2,keyheight = unit(0.03,"npc")))

#### Distribution of the fire-sourced PM2.5 concentrations (average for 2000–2014) and the locations of the analyzed livebirths (gray dots).

The circles represent the rate of very low birthweight births among the analyzed livebirths by country.

## Methods

### Study population

The birthweight data and relevant individual variables were extracted from 113 individual Demographic and Health Surveys (DHSs) representing 54 LMICs from 2000 to 2014 (Figure 1). The DHSs were conducted by the US Agency for International Development to characterize the demography and health of more than 90 developing countries. DHSs are usually conducted every 5 years in each country using a two-stage sampling design. Information on demographic factors, socioeconomic factors, and health status was collected from a nationally representative probability sample of households. Well-trained fieldworkers conducted the surveys using uniformly designed questionnaires in the native language. The primary sampling units (e.g., villages or blocks) have begun to be geocoded in recent waves using global positioning systems (GPSs). The GPS-enhanced DHSs were matched with environmental exposure and thus included in our analyses. Please refer to the open-access website for detailed information on the DHS database: https://www.dhsprogram.com/.

All females aged 15–49 years within each selected household were eligible respondents of the survey. The health outcome analyzed in this study was birthweight. The DHSs asked the screened mothers to recall the birthweight of all children born during the 5 years leading up to the survey date. To characterize different levels of reduced birthweight, we examined two binary outcomes: LBW (birthweight <2500 g) and, other covariates, such as maternal age and birth time (in months), were extracted from the relevant questionnaires.

### Exposure assessment

We assessed ambient exposure to LFS as the PM2.5 concentration attributable to landscape fires (hereafter, defined as fire-sourced PM2.5), referring to a previous study 31 Stowell et al.2019. The fire-sourced PM2.5 concentrations were estimated using the GEOS-Chem . The detailed settings of the GEOS-Chem are provided in the previous publication 39 Xue et al.2021 and briefly summarized here. We used the 11-01 version of GEOS-Chem model (https://geos-chem.seas.harvard.edu/). The meteorological fields to drive the model were directly obtained from Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications Version 2 (MERRA-2), which is freely distributed by the Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/). Anthropogenic emissions inputted into the model were obtained from the global inventory of Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) 12 Hoesly et al.2018, from 2000 to 2014; the fire emissions during the same period were collected from the Global Fire Emission Database (GFED4s, https://www.globalfiredata.org/). The GEOS-Chem finally simulated the ground-surface concentrations of PM2.5 in a regular grid of 2° × 2.5° across the world.

The fire-sourced PM2.5 was derived from a comparison between two GEOS-Chem model runs. The two models were identical except for switching on and off fire emissions. We quantified the fraction (ρm) of fire-attributed PM2.5 using the following equation:

ρ m y=(P M o n 2.5,m y−P M o f f 2.5,m y)/P M o m 2.5,m y

where the superscripts on and off denote the two simulations switching on and off fire emissions, respectively; and the subscripts m and y are month and year indicators, respectively.

Additionally, considering the potential errors in the CTM procedure 30 Solazzo et al.2012, the bias correction approach has been widely applied to improve CTM performance in exposure assessments using ground-surface observational data 42 Zhang et al.2020. We utilized a well-developed and widely utilized product of satellite-based PM2.5 estimates 34 Donkelaar et al.2016 (PM2.5, ysatellite) in the bias correction. This product has a spatial resolution of 0.05° × 0.05° and was publicly available from 1998 to 2018 as the gridded annual mean (https://sites.wustl.edu/acag/datasets/surface-pm2-5/#V4.GL.03). However, since a key input into the product, satellite measurements of aerosol from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer are only available after February 2000, we believe that the estimates after the date have a better quality than those before. Therefore, we utilized the product to calibrate the monthly GEOS-Chem simulations from February 2000 to December 2014. We prepared the GEOS-Chem simulations (ρm,y and PM2.5, m,yon) in the same 0.05° × 0.05° grid using an inversed distance-weighted downscaling approach before bias correction. The bias correction rate (ηy) was calculated as

η=P M s a t e l l i t e 2.5,y÷(1/12∗∑m P M o n 2.5,m,y)

The monthly exposure indicator of fire-sourced or non-fire-sourced PM2.5 was finally derived as

[F i r e−s o u r c e d P M 2.5]m,y=η y×ρ m,y×P M o n 2.5,m,y,[N o n−f i r e−s o u r c e d P M 2.5]m,y=η y×(1−ρ m,y)×P M o n 2.5,m,y

We utilized the non-fire-sourced PM2.5 as a potential confounder in the subsequent epidemiological analysis. We also collected other environmental variables, including ambient temperature and humidity data, from an assimilated dataset called Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (please refer to the supplemental text for more details). The variables were downloaded as monthly gridded values and prepared in the 0.05° × 0.05° grid in the same way as we processed the GEOS-Chem outputs.

Since fire-sourced PM2.5 is mixed with particles from other sources, it cannot be easily measured. Although the CTM-based approach has been widely utilized in a few large-scale studies 38 Xue et al.2021 41 Ye et al.2021 to assess the LFS exposure, accuracy of its results cannot be evaluated directly. Therefore, in this study, we assessed the overall performance of the GEOS-Chem model by comparing the simulated PM2.5 concentrations with the satellite-based estimates 34 Donkelaar et al.2016. At the surveyed locations (i.e., the gray dots in Figure 1), we found that the two estimators were in good agreement with each other (Pearson correlation coefficient, R2 = 0.76; more details on the comparison are shown in Supplementary file 1).

To understand the associations between birthweight and environmental variables, we focused on exposure during gestation. As the DHSs did not record the specific duration of gestation, we utilized the 9-month average preceding the birth month as exposure time during pregnancy.

### Study design

To evaluate the association between fire-sourced PM2.5 and birthweight, we applied a sibling-matched case–control study, similar to our previous work 39 Xue et al.2021 40 Xue et al.2021 40 Xue et al.2021 37 Xue et al.2019. We defined the descendants of the same mother as a family group of matched siblings and compared birthweights within each group. The family-level baseline birthweight (defined as the mean birthweight within each group) can be affected by many complex factors, including genetics, socioeconomic position, and quality of local medical services, which can be difficult to measure. We matched the mothers to control for those unmeasured confounders in the study design. A sibling-matched case–control design is a simple, robust, and cost-efficient method, particularly for large population data with potential heterogeneity 8 Colley et al.2019 9 Curtis 1997.

We extracted the females with at as least two valid records of newborns from all available individual DHSs. Each valid record was defined using the following inclusion criteria: (1) a valid birthweight, (2) a record of the GPS coordinates, (3) a valid birthdate, and (4) valid environmental exposure values (some of the satellite-based PM2.5 estimates were not available for some locations, such as small islands). Finally, our dataset assembled 113 individual surveys from 54 countries (Figure 1) and included 227,948 newborns classified into 109,137 groups according to their mothers.

### Statistical analyses

According to the sibling-matched method, we used a fixed-effects regression model to evaluate the associations between fire-sourced PM2.5 and LBW or VLBW. The model was specified as

y i,j∼x i,j β+z i,j+Θ i

where the subscripts i and j denote the indices of the mother-affiliated group and child, respectively; xi,j denotes the concentration of fire-sourced PM2.5; z i,j denotes the adjusted covariates; yi,j denotes the outcome variable; and θi is a nuisance parameter for the fixed effect to control for group-specific unmeasured confounders. The model was specified as Gaussian regression when setting yi,j as the birthweight and as logit regression when setting yi,j as the logit-transformed probability of LBW or VLBW. The adjusted covariates included maternal age; child sex; multiple births; non-fire-sourced PM2.5; spline terms of birth order (with 5 degrees of freedom [DF]), of temperature (3 DF), of humidity (3 DF), of the calendar year (5 DF), and of the monthly index (4 DF); and a spatiotemporal effect parameterized by the interaction between country and calendar year. The nonlinear effects of month and year controlled for the seasonal periodic variation and long-term trend in child health, respectively. The spatiotemporal effect captured country-specific trends. The association between birthweight and LFS was evaluated by the regression coefficient β for 1 μg/m3 increases in fire-sourced PM2.5. The association with LBW or VLBW was evaluated by excess risk [ = (1 – exp(β)) × 100%] for a 1 μg/m3 increase in fire-sourced PM2.5. All environmental exposures were quantified using the same time window. The major time window was the 9 months before birth. We also calculated the alternative exposure indicator as an average during the 3 or 6 months preceding birth.

In sensitivity analyses, we first derived the lag-distributed model to explore how the association varied during the exposure time window. As the specific duration of gestation was not recorded, before actual data analysis, we utilized the 9-month average preceding the birth month as the major exposure time window. After conducting the major analysis, we re-estimated the effects of fire-sourced PM2.5 on birthweight change, LBW, or VLBW, by different time windows using the lag-distributed model. Next, subpopulation-specified associations were estimated using interaction analyses to detect potential heterogeneity. Third, we developed nonlinear associations by replacing the linear term of fire-sourced PM2.5 using a set of thin-plate spline functions. Fourth, to examine potential recall bias, we estimated the associations by strata of the durations from birth to survey time (the duration is defined as recall period in this study). We assumed a shorter recall period indicated for a lower likelihood of outcome misclassification. Fifth, to test whether the estimated associations were attributable to LFS exposure or other direct damage related to landscape fires (e.g., destroying human habitats), we derived an indicator for the transported fire-sourced PM2.5, according to a satellite image of the burned area (MCD64A1, https://lpdaacsvc.cr.usgs.gov/appeears/). The fire-sourced PM2.5 at the pixels with the zero-burned area during gestation were defined as smoke transported from other locations. The associations with transported fire-sourced PM2.5 could be indicative of the effect of LFS exposure via the inhalation pathway.

Family-level baseline birthweight and the correlated gestation length can be determined by factors such as genetics and socioeconomic level, which may also affect the association between the within-group change in birthweight and LFS exposure. The fixed-effects regression models actually infer an association by examining the coherence between derivation of individual-level birthweight from the family-level mean (i.e., the expected birthweight given a specific family) and the corresponding exposure. To show that, we defined the family-level baseline birthweight as yi. Equation (4) was equivalently transformed as Δyi,j = (yi,j − yi) ~ xi,j β+ zi,jγ + (θi − yi), where (θi − yi) is viewed as a new nuisance parameter θi*. The nature of fixed-effects model made it possible to explore how the effect of fire-sourced PM2.5 varied according to family-level mean birthweight. Accordingly, we derived a baseline-varying association model as follows:

△y i,j∼f(y i)x i,j+z i,j y+Θ∗i

All analyses were performed in R (version 4.0.2; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Inference for the fixed-effects models was performed using the fixest package. The lag-distributed effect was parameterized using the dlnm package, and the thin-plate splines for the nonlinear association and baseline-varying effect were parameterized using the mgcv package. Source data for figures and R codes for the epidemiological models are documented in Source code 1.

## Results

### Descriptive summary

Among the 227,948 livebirths analyzed from 54 LMICs, there were 109,137 groups of siblings who were matched to their mothers. Each group had an average of 2.13 (standard deviation [SD] 0.36) livebirths. Approximately half of the livebirths were from Sub-Saharan Africa and one-quarter from South Asia. The mean birthweight was 3,082 (SD 724) g. There were 31,854 LBW births and 2,912 very low birthweight (VLBW) births. More statistics on the analyzed livebirths are shown in Supplementary file 1b.

The spatial distribution of the long-term average fire-sourced PM2.5 concentrations is displayed in Figure 1. Our modeling results indicate that the hotspots of LFS include regions of the Congo rainforest basin, Amazon rainforest basin, Indonesian forests, Siberia forests, and other forest areas. Our analyzed samples included newborns from the first three regions. Among our samples, the average concentration of full gestational exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 was 4.29 (SD: 5.53) µg/m3. A detailed summary of the environmental exposures is presented in Supplementary file 1b.

Gestational exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 varied widely between family groups; it was higher in those living closer to hotspot regions (e.g., forests). Approximately 92% of the variation in fire-sourced PM2.5 exposure was between family groups and 8% was within family groups. For the total variation in birthweight, 71.7% was between groups and 28.3% within groups (Table 1). The within- or between-group variations reflected temporal or spatial changes in those variables, respectively. Birthweight and fire-sourced PM2.5 were negatively correlated in the temporal dimension but positively correlated in the spatial dimension. As the spatial patterns in birthweight and fire-sourced PM2.5 were determined by geographic, socioeconomic, and cultural factors, the between-group correlations may have been confounded by their common determiners, such as urbanization level. The complex correlations between birthweight and LFS suggest that statistical inference of their associations should be cautiously determined based on well-designed epidemiological analysis.

Table 1.

#### Between- or within-group variations in birthweight and gestational exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 and their correlations.

| Standard deviation (% of total variance) | Correlation (R) |
--- | --- | --- | ---
Birthweight(g) | Fire-sourced PM2.5 g/m3 |  |
Total | 724 (100%) | 5.53 (100%) | 0.1594
Between groups of matched siblings | 613 (71.7%) | 5.30 (91.7%) | 0.1973
Within groups of matched siblings | 386 (28.3%) | 1.59 (8.3%) | −0.0035

### Association between LFS and birthweight

Although the fully adjusted model indicated that a 1 µg/m3 increase in exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 during the 9 months before birth was significantly associated with a 2.17 g (95% CI 0.56–3.77) birthweight reduction, the association was sensitive to differences in the adjusted covariates and exposure time window (Figure 2). For example, the unadjusted model reported the estimated effect as a birthweight reduction of 0.84 g (95% CI −0.53 to 2.22). The lag-specific associations did not display a clear time-varying pattern (Figure 2—figure supplement 1), which suggests a linear increase in strength in the association with increased length of the exposure time window (Figure 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 2). The subpopulation-specific results suggest that the association was potentially heterogeneous (Figure 2—figure supplement 3). The association was stronger for female infants, newborns of nulliparous mothers, or newborns of unemployed mothers compared with the corresponding references (i.e., male infants, newborns of multiparous mothers, or newborns of employed mothers, respectively). The nonlinear analysis confirmed the adverse effect of LFS on birthweight (Figure 3). The sublinear association suggests a saturated effect of an 60 g birthweight reduction for exposure to extreme fires, which contributed to a PM2.5~ concentration >~20 µg/m3.

Figure 2.

    ggplot(data=coef)+
      geom_linerange(aes(x=lag2,ymin=lo,ymax=up,group=lag),position=position_dodge(width=0.75))+
      geom_point(aes(x=lag2,y=mid,group=lag,shape=lag,col=sig),position=position_dodge(width=0.75))+
      facet_wrap(~y,scales="free_x",strip.position = "bottom",nrow=1)+
      coord_flip()+
      theme_minimal()+
      ylab(expression("Estimate for per increment of"~1~mu~g/m^3~'in exposure to fire-sourced'~PM[2.5]~'before birth'))+
      geom_hline(aes(yintercept=0),linetype=2,col=1)+
      theme(axis.text.x=element_text(vjust=0.5),
            strip.background  = element_rect(fill="grey90",color=NA),
            legend.position = "top",legend.direction = "horizontal")+
      scale_x_discrete(labels=parse(text=levels(coef$lag2)))+
      xlab("Sequentially adjusted models")+
      scale_shape_manual(values=c(4,15,16),name="Exposure time-window (month)")+
      scale_color_manual(values=c("black","red"),name="P-value < 0.05")

#### Effects of fire-sourced PM2.5, estimated by linear models.

The dots with error bars show the estimated associations between gestational exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 and birthweight change, low birthweight, or very low birthweight. The dots represent the point estimates, and bars represent the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

#### The estimated associations between fire-sourced PM2.5 and birthweight change, low birthweight or very low birthweight, by different lags.

The nth lagged exposure is defined as the concentration of fire-sourced PM2.5 during the nth month before birth. The results are estimated from the lag-distributed models.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

#### The cumulated birthweight change associated with an average of fire-sourced PM2.5 concentrations from a lagged month to birth.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3.

#### The subpopulation-specific associations between gestational exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 and birthweight change, low birthweight and very low birthweight.

Figure 3.

    ggplot(data=curve)+
      geom_path(aes(x=x,y=lo),linetype=2)+
      geom_path(aes(x=x,y=up),linetype=2)+
      geom_path(aes(x=x,y=fit))+
      geom_rect(data=exposure,aes(xmin=lo,xmax=up,ymin=y,ymax=y),col=1)+
      geom_rect(data=exposure,aes(xmin=q25,xmax=q75,ymin=y-2,ymax=y+2),fill="white",col=1)+
      geom_rect(data=exposure,aes(xmin=q50,xmax=q50,ymin=y-2,ymax=y+2),fill="white",col=1)+
      geom_point(data=exposure,aes(x=mu,y=y),col=2,size=1)+
      scale_fill_npg()+
      scale_color_npg()+
      theme_bw()+
      xlab(expression('Level of gestational exposure to fire-sourced'~PM[2.5]~(mu~g/m^3)))+
      geom_hline(aes(yintercept=0),linetype=1,col="grey50")+
      theme(legend.position = c(0.99,0.99),
            legend.justification = c(1,1),
            legend.title = element_blank(),
            strip.placement = "outside",
            panel.grid.major.x = element_blank(),
            panel.grid.minor.y = element_blank(),
            panel.grid.minor.x = element_blank(),
            axis.title.y=element_text(hjust=0.3))+
      geom_text(data=exposure,aes(x=up,y=y,label=reg),hjust=-0.1,vjust=0.5,size=5)+
      scale_y_continuous(breaks=c(0,seq(-150,-25,25)))+
      scale_x_continuous(limits=c(0,40))+
      ylab("Birthweight change (g)")

#### The nonlinear association between gestational exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 and change in birthweight.

The solid line represents the point estimates, the dashed line represents the 95% confidence intervals, the boxplots represent the distributions of different exposure levels by regions, and the red dots represent the mean exposure level.

### Association between LFS and VLBW

Our fully adjusted models suggested that LFS exposure during the 9 months before birth was significantly associated with an increased risk of LBW or VLBW. According to the estimates, the risks of LBW and VLBW increased by 2.80% (95% CI 0.97–4.66) and 11.68% (95% CI 3.59–20.40), respectively, for each 1 µg/m3 increase in exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5. Compared to LBW, VLBW was more strongly associated with fire-sourced PM2.5. The estimated association for LBW was sensitive to different covariate adjustments (Figure 2) and was potentially heterogeneous among subpopulations (Figure 2—figure supplement 3). The association for VLBW was robust, given the adjustments for different covariates (Figure 2), and was less heterogeneous (Figure 2—figure supplement 3). Among all effect modifiers, only the type of cooking energy, which was indicated for indoor sources of particulate matter, significantly changed the association between VLBW and fire-sourced PM2.5 (p-value = 0.02, Figure 2—figure supplement 3). The use of unclear cooking energy, as a competing risk factor for fire-sourced PM2.5, significantly weakened the association between VLBW and fire-sourced PM2.5.

To further explore why VLBW was more strongly associated with fire-sourced PM2.5 than was LBW, we developed a model to estimate the baseline-varying association between birthweight and fire-sourced PM2.5. As a result, the absolute change in birthweight for per unit exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 varied with the baseline of family-level mean birthweight (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Livebirths with an extremely low or high baseline birthweight were more susceptible to fire-sourced PM2.5 than were those with a moderate baseline birthweight in terms of the absolute birthweight change (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). As a reduction in birthweight and a family-level baseline co-determined the increased incidence of LBW or VLBW, the relative change in birthweight reflected the relevant risk. Newborns from families with a lower baseline were more susceptible to fire-sourced PM2.5 in terms of a relative birthweight reduction (Figure 4). This finding partially explains why gestational exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 was robustly and strongly associated with VLBW. According to our estimates, a 1 µg/m3 increase in fire-sourced PM2.5 was associated with a relative birthweight reduction of 1.47% (95% CI 0.06–2.88), 0.54% (95% CI 0.03–1.05), 0.16% (95% CI 0.01–0.31), or 0.03% (95% CI −0.04–0.10) for livebirths with a baseline birthweight of 1500, 2000, 2500, or 3000 g, respectively.

Figure 4.

    ggplot(data=curve)+
      geom_path(aes(x=x,y=lo),linetype=2)+
      geom_path(aes(x=x,y=up),linetype=2)+
      geom_path(aes(x=x,y=fit))+
      geom_rect(data=outcome,aes(xmin=lo,xmax=up,ymin=y,ymax=y),col=1)+
      geom_rect(data=outcome,aes(xmin=q25,xmax=q75,ymin=y-2,ymax=y+2),fill="white",col=1)+
      geom_rect(data=outcome,aes(xmin=q50,xmax=q50,ymin=y-2,ymax=y+2),fill="white",col=1)+
      geom_point(data=outcome,aes(x=mu,y=y),col=2)+
      scale_fill_npg()+
      scale_color_npg()+
      theme_bw()+
      xlab("Birthweight (g)")+
      geom_hline(aes(yintercept=0),linetype=1,col="grey50")+
      theme(legend.position = c(0.99,0.99),
            legend.justification = c(1,1),
            legend.title = element_blank(),
            strip.placement = "outside",
            panel.grid.major.x = element_blank(),
            panel.grid.minor.y = element_blank(),
            panel.grid.minor.x = element_blank(),
            axis.title.y=element_text(hjust=0))+
      geom_text(data=outcome,aes(x=mu,y=y-2,label=reg),hjust=0.5,vjust=1.1,size=5)+
      scale_y_continuous(breaks=c(0,seq(-100,-20,20)),labels=c(0,seq(-100,-20,20))/10)+
      ylab(expression("Relative birthweight change (%) per 1"~mu~g/m^3~"increment in fire-sourced"~PM[2.5]))+
      scale_x_continuous(limits=c(1000,6000),breaks=seq(1000,6500,500))

#### Baseline-varying effect of fire-sourced PM2.5 on birthweight.

The lines show the estimated association (y-axis) between gestational exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 and relative change in birthweight, given different baseline birthweights (x-axis). The solid line represents the point estimates, the dashed line represents the 95% confidence intervals, and the boxplots represent the distributions of different birthweights by region.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

#### The baseline-varying association between gestational exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 and absolute birthweight change.

The solid line presents the point estimates, the dashed line presents the 95% confidence intervals, and the boxplots present the distributions of different birthweight levels by regions.

### Sensitivity analyses

First, we explored potential recall bias using sensitivity analyses, and the estimated associations were not significantly different according to recall period (Figure 2—figure supplement 3). Second, we examined the spatial variations in the estimated associations. Although analysis of differences in region-specific associations reported nonsignificant results (Figure 2—figure supplement 3), we could not completely rule out the possibility of spatial heterogeneity in the estimated results. As most of our analyzed livebirths were from Sub-Saharan Africa, only those estimates were significant, and the remaining region-specific results had wide-ranging 95% CIs (Figure 2—figure supplement 3). Third, we explored whether the estimated adverse effects were attributable to ambient LFS exposure or other impacts (e.g., social stress) relevant to landscape fires. The estimated effects of exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 were not significantly different between locations without burning and those with burning (Figure 2—figure supplement 3). These results confirm that ambient exposure was the major exposure pathway for our analyzed outcomes.

## Discussion

This study revealed an association between increased risk of VLBW and exposure to LFS during pregnancy in 54 LIMCs. We found that gestational exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 potentially reduced birthweight, and the infants with a low family-level mean of birthweight were susceptible to the effect of LFS. We present the first sibling-matched study on the association between birthweight and fire-sourced PM2.5 from multiple LIMCs.

LFS contains numerous hazardous pollutants and exerts both short- and long-term effects on human health 36 Xu et al.2020. An adverse birth outcome is one of the consequences. 13 Holstius et al.2012 estimated that the mean birthweights of fire-exposed infants are 7.0 g (95% CI 11.8–2.2), 9.7 g (95% CI 14.5–4.8), and 3.3 g (95% CI −0.6–7.2) lower than those of unexposed infants when wildfires occurred during the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. In a retrospective cohort study in Brazil, fire-exposed mothers (defined as the highest PM2.5 concentration quartile) reported a higher risk of LBW than did unexposed mothers. The adjusted odds ratios for exposure during the second and third trimesters were 1.51 (95% CI 1.04–2.17) and 1.50 (95% CI 1.06–2.15), respectively 6 Silva et al.2014. 1 Abdo et al.2019 showed that a 1 μg/m3 increase in the wildfire-sourced PM2.5 concentration during the first trimester was associated with a 5.7 g (95% CI 0.4–11.1) reduction in birthweight in the United States. In contrast, an Australian cross-sectional study reported that the average birthweight of male infants exposed to the 2003 Canberra wildfires was significantly higher than that of unexposed peers 25 O’Donnell and Behie 2015. That study attributed the positive association between wildfire smoke and birthweight change to the potentially increased levels of maternal blood glucose after exposure 25 O’Donnell and Behie 2015. The mixed results might be due to differences among studies in terms of epidemiological design, population characterization, exposure time window, and competing risk factors. Our results are comparable with most previous findings. Additionally, although there are few studies on fire-sourced PM2.5 similar to ours, a large number of studies have focused on the effect of gestational exposure to urban ambient PM2.5 on birthweight. A recent meta-analysis, which included more than 2.7 million participants, reported that the pooled risk ratio of LBW for a 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 exposure was 1.081 (95% CI 1.043–1.120; 20 Li et al.2020).

The family-level mean birthweight varied widely between households (Table 1). These variations may have been caused by many factors, including genetics, socioeconomic position (e.g., nutrition), and indoor household pollution. As birthweight is positively correlated with gestation length, a poor family-level baseline birthweight comprehensively indicates a combined risk of short gestation and LBW. Because the cumulative effect of fire-sourced PM2.5 was observed to increase with exposure duration (Figure 2—figure supplement 2), a larger birthweight at the family level, as indicated for a longer gestation, increased the absolute effect of the per-unit LFS exposure (Figure 4—figure supplement 1).

As our models did not control for gestation length due to the lack of relevant data, the estimated associations reflected the joint outcome of LFS exposure by reducing gestation length or birthweight. The fetus grows in a sublinear temporal pattern 28 Salomon et al.2007 during the late gestational stage, which suggests its weight increases to an approximately stable level before birth. Considering this sublinear relationship and given the different baseline birthweights, the same reduction in gestation length led to different reductions in birthweight. The marginal effect of a shorter gestation period on the reduction in birthweight is larger for an infant with a lower baseline birthweight. For instance, if an infant is expected to reach the stable level of fetal weight, a marginal reduction in its gestational age will not considerably change the birthweight. As exposure to LFS has been reported to cause a short gestation 1 Abdo et al.2019, its indirect effect on reduced birthweight can be enhanced by poor baseline maternal health.

Reducing the risk of LBW is one of the 2025 WHO global targets, and it contributes to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Although major interventions to reduce LBW have focused on improving maternal nutrition, environmental toxic pollutants, also identified as risk factors, can additionally contribute to the relevant disease burden. For instance, exposure to air pollution was linked to a global burden of 476,000 infant deaths in 2019 during the first month of life via increased risks of LBW and premature birth 24 Murray et al.2020. LFS induces peak concentrations of PM2.5 lasting for a few weeks or months. Its spatial distribution is also different from that of urban PM2.5. It is highly clustered in forestry areas (Figure 1). Compared to urban PM2.5, fire-sourced PM2.5 is distributed more skewedly. Therefore, the individual-level impacts on exposed mothers are not negligible. Particularly, LFS exposure frequently occurred in LMICs (Figure 1), where the fire-sourced PM2.5 adversely affected infants with other risk factors, such as malnutrition. However, due to the lower specificity of our model evaluating birthweight without adjusting for gestation length, we could not evaluate the clinical outcomes or disease burden of the LFS-attributed birthweight reductions. As there is an increasing probability of landscape fire under global climate change, assessing the adverse impacts of LFS exposure is of public health importance to protect maternal health in LMICs. Future studies should be conducted to answer this question.

This study was associated with the following limitations. First, the lack of data on specific gestation lengths in the DHSs limited our exploration. Without this information, we could not distinguish the exposure time window, which introduced potential exposure misclassifications into the epidemiological analyses. Particularly, for the newborns with lower birthweight, their gestations could be shorter, which could lead to a larger likelihood of exposure misclassification. This can explain why the exposures at the 4–6 months before birth were significantly linked to all examined outcomes (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Compared to exposures during the time window, those at longer lags (e.g., lag-8 or -9 month) tend to be pre-pregnancy rather than gestational exposure. Also, we could not determine the clinical importance of the analyzed birthweight without normalizing it to gestation length. Second, characterizing LFS exposure is always challenging. Previous studies measured exposure using surrogates, such as the temporal duration of landscape fires or satellite remote sensing of fire points. To increase interpretability, we utilized fire-sourced PM2.5 as a direct indicator of ambient exposure to LFS. However, as the exposure assessments were based on a CTM, the uncertainties introduced by the modeling procedure could not be avoided completely. The potential errors enhanced the exposure misclassifications in this study and thus may have resulted in a biased association. For CTM simulations, their accuracy depends on quality of the inputted emission inventories. Since the large fires can be easily captured by satellite images, which have been considered in the inventory utilized in this study, we believe the effect estimated from a high-exposure region is less biased than that from a low-exposure region. According to the region-specific estimates (Figure 2—figure supplement 3), we find that the estimated effects are significant in the highest-exposure region, Sub-Sahara Africa (Figure 3), but not in the rest. The result suggests that the exposure misclassification caused and introduced by CTM simulations may lead to underestimated associations. Third, since the analyzed samples were living newborns, our estimates were potentially subjected to survival bias. For instance, fire-sourced PM2.5 was associated with extremely reduced birthweight, which increases the probability of stillbirth or neonatal death. In other words, our sample may have included fewer embryos more susceptible to fire-sourced PM2.5 than expected. Therefore, survival bias could have led to an underestimated association by ignoring those susceptible embryos. Fourth, although there have been some previous studies analyzing the birthweight outcome using DHS data 3 Bellizzi and Padrini 2020, the self-reported records may be inaccurate due to potential recall bias and lead to potential outcome misclassification. The effect of LFS should be confirmed in future by high-quality data on clinical diagnosis of LBW or VLBW. Finally, a sibling-matched study requires a selected sample, which may have lowered the representativeness of this study. The inclusion of infants surveyed by the DHS in this study was determined by many factors, such as family size and planning, willingness to bear a child, socioeconomic position, and contraceptive behavior. However, some of those factors could not be easily measured, which impeded the development of a set of sampling weights to increase the representativeness of our estimates.

In conclusion, we used a global-scale sibling-matched case–control study to identify an association between gestational exposure to fire-sourced PM2.5 and reduced birthweight in LMICs. The association was sensitive to regression model settings and potential heterogeneity among different subpopulations. Newborns from families with a low baseline level of birthweight were susceptible to LFS-associated birthweight reduction, which was consistent with our finding of a strong and robust association between fire-sourced PM2.5 and VLBW. This study adds to the epidemiological evidence on the adverse effects of LFS on birthweight. Relevant interventions regarding frequently occurring landscape fires, such as climate change mitigations, should be taken to protect maternal and infant health.

## References

1. 1. M Abdo
   2. I Ward
   3. K O’Dell
   4. B Ford
   5. JR Pierce
   6. EV Fischer
   7. JL Crooks
   2019 Impact of wildfire smoke on adverse pregnancy outcomes in Colorado, 2007-2015 16 International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
2. 1. PK Barn
   2. CT Elliott
   3. RW Allen
   4. T Kosatsky
   5. K Rideout
   6. SB Henderson
   2016 Portable air cleaners should be at the forefront of the public health response to landscape fire smoke 15 Environmental Health
3. 1. S Bellizzi
   2. S Padrini
   2020 Quality utilization of antenatal care and low birth weight: Evidence from 18 demographic health surveys 26 Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal = La Revue de Sante de La Mediterranee Orientale = Al-Majallah al-Sihhiyah Li-Sharq al-Mutawassit 1381 1387
4. 1. EM Bijnens
   2. C Derom
   3. M Gielen
   4. E Winckelmans
   5. F Fierens
   6. R Vlietinck
   7. MP Zeegers
   8. TS Nawrot
   2016 Small for gestational age and exposure to particulate air pollution in the early-life environment of twins 148 Environmental Research 39 45
5. 1. H Blencowe
   2. J Krasevec
   3. M Onis
   4. RE Black
   5. X An
   6. GA Stevens
   7. E Borghi
   8. C Hayashi
   9. D Estevez
   10. L Cegolon
   11. S Shiekh
   12. V Ponce Hardy
   13. JE Lawn
   14. S Cousens
   2019 National, regional, and worldwide estimates of low birthweight in 2015, with trends from 2000: A systematic analysis 7 The Lancet. Global Health
6. 1. AM Silva
   2. GP Moi
   3. IE Mattos
   4. S Hacon
   2014 Low birth weight at term and the presence of fine particulate matter and carbon monoxide in the brazilian Amazon: A population-based retrospective cohort study 14 BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
7. 1. WE Cascio
   2018 Wildland fire smoke and human health 624 The Science of the Total Environment 586 595
8. 1. E Colley
   2. S Hamilton
   3. P Smith
   4. NV Morgan
   5. A Coomarasamy
   6. S Allen
   2019 Potential genetic causes of miscarriage in euploid pregnancies: A systematic review 25 Human Reproduction Update 452 472
9. 1. D Curtis
   1997 Use of siblings as controls in case-control association studies 61 Annals of Human Genetics 319 333
10. 1. RJ Delfino
    2. S Brummel
    3. J Wu
    4. H Stern
    5. B Ostro
    6. M Lipsett
    7. A Winer
    8. DH Street
    9. L Zhang
    10. T Tjoa
    11. DL Gillen
    2009 The relationship of respiratory and cardiovascular hospital admissions to the Southern California wildfires of 2003 66 Occupational and Environmental Medicine 189 197
11. 1. S Hantson
    2. S Pueyo
    3. E Chuvieco
    2015 Global fire size distribution is driven by human impact and climate 24 Global Ecology and Biogeography 77 86
12. 1. RM Hoesly
    2. SJ Smith
    3. L Feng
    4. Z Klimont
    5. G Janssens-Maenhout
    6. T Pitkanen
    7. JJ Seibert
    8. L Vu
    9. RJ Andres
    10. RM Bolt
    11. TC Bond
    12. L Dawidowski
    13. N Kholod
    14. J Kurokawa
    15. M Li
    16. L Liu
    17. Z Lu
    18. MCP Moura
    19. PR O’Rourke
    20. Q Zhang
    2018 Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS 11 Geoscientific Model Development 369 408
13. 1. DM Holstius
    2. CE Reid
    3. BM Jesdale
    4. R Morello-Frosch
    2012 Birth weight following pregnancy during the 2003 Southern California Wildfires 120 Environmental Health Perspectives 1340 1345
14. 1. A Hviid
    2. M Melbye
    2007 The impact of birth weight on infectious disease hospitalization in childhood 165 American Journal of Epidemiology 756 761
15. 1. BG Janssen
    2. HM Byun
    3. W Gyselaers
    4. W Lefebvre
    5. AA Baccarelli
    6. TS Nawrot
    2015 Placental mitochondrial methylation and exposure to airborne particulate matter in the early life environment: An environage birth cohort study 10 Epigenetics 536 544
16. 1. FH Johnston
    2. SB Henderson
    3. Y Chen
    4. JT Randerson
    5. M Marlier
    6. RS Defries
    7. P Kinney
    8. DMJS Bowman
    9. M Brauer
    2012 Estimated global mortality attributable to smoke from landscape fires 120 Environmental Health Perspectives 695 701
17. 1. E Kolarzyk
    2. WM Szot
    3. J Lyszczarz
    2005 Lung function and breathing regulation parameters during pregnancy 272 Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 53 58
18. 1. BE Lee
    2. HS Park
    3. YJ Kim
    4. EA Park
    5. YC Hong
    6. EH Ha
    2004 Air pollution exposure and health effects in fetus 37 Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health = Yebang Uihakhoe Chi 291 299
19. 1. X Li
    2. S Huang
    3. A Jiao
    4. X Yang
    5. J Yun
    6. Y Wang
    7. X Xue
    8. Y Chu
    9. F Liu
    10. Y Liu
    11. M Ren
    12. X Chen
    13. N Li
    14. Y Lu
    15. Z Mao
    16. L Tian
    17. H Xiang
    2017 Association between ambient fine particulate matter and preterm birth or term low birth weight: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis 227 Environmental Pollution 596 605
20. 1. C Li
    2. M Yang
    3. Z Zhu
    4. S Sun
    5. Q Zhang
    6. J Cao
    7. R Ding
    2020 Maternal exposure to air pollution and the risk of low birth weight: A meta-analysis of cohort studies 190 Environmental Research
21. 1. CS Malley
    2. JCI Kuylenstierna
    3. HW Vallack
    4. DK Henze
    5. H Blencowe
    6. MR Ashmore
    2017 Preterm birth associated with maternal fine particulate matter exposure: A global, regional and national assessment 101 Environment International 173 182
22. 1. CJ Matz
    2. M Egyed
    3. G Xi
    4. J Racine
    5. R Pavlovic
    6. R Rittmaster
    7. SB Henderson
    8. DM Stieb
    2020 Health impact analysis of PM2.5 from wildfire smoke in Canada (2013-2015, 2017-2018 725 The Science of the Total Environment
23. 1. G Morgan
    2. V Sheppeard
    3. B Khalaj
    4. A Ayyar
    5. D Lincoln
    6. B Jalaludin
    7. J Beard
    8. S Corbett
    9. T Lumley
    2010 Effects of bushfire smoke on daily mortality and hospital admissions in Sydney, Australia 21 Epidemiology 47 55
24. 1. CJ Murray
    2. AY Aravkin
    3. P Zheng
    4. C Abbafati
    5. KM Abbas
    6. M Abbasi-Kangevari
    7. I Abdollahpour
    2020 Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 396 Lancet 1223 1249
25. 1. MH O’Donnell
    2. AM Behie
    2015 Effects of wildfire disaster exposure on male birth weight in an australian population 2015 Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health 344 354
26. 1. AM Padula
    2. W Yang
    3. FW Lurmann
    4. J Balmes
    5. SK Hammond
    6. GM Shaw
    2019 Prenatal exposure to air pollution, maternal diabetes and preterm birth 170 Environmental Research 160 167
27. 1. M Pedersen
    2. L Giorgis-Allemand
    3. C Bernard
    4. I Aguilera
    5. AMN Andersen
    6. F Ballester
    7. RMJ Beelen
    8. L Chatzi
    9. M Cirach
    10. A Danileviciute
    11. A Dedele
    12. M Eijsden
    13. M Estarlich
    14. A Fernández-Somoano
    15. MF Fernández
    16. F Forastiere
    17. U Gehring
    18. R Grazuleviciene
    19. O Gruzieva
    20. B Heude
    21. G Hoek
    22. K Hoogh
    23. EH Hooven
    24. SE Håberg
    25. VWV Jaddoe
    26. C Klümper
    27. M Korek
    28. U Krämer
    29. A Lerchundi
    30. J Lepeule
    31. P Nafstad
    32. W Nystad
    33. E Patelarou
    34. D Porta
    35. D Postma
    36. O Raaschou-Nielsen
    37. P Rudnai
    38. J Sunyer
    39. E Stephanou
    40. M Sørensen
    41. E Thiering
    42. D Tuffnell
    43. MJ Varró
    44. TGM Vrijkotte
    45. A Wijga
    46. M Wilhelm
    47. J Wright
    48. MJ Nieuwenhuijsen
    49. G Pershagen
    50. B Brunekreef
    51. M Kogevinas
    52. R Slama
    2013 Ambient air pollution and low birthweight: a European cohort study (ESCAPE 1 The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine 695 704
28. 1. LJ Salomon
    2. JP Bernard
    3. Y Ville
    2007 Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20–36 weeks’ gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range 29 Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 550 555
29. 1. TT Samaras
    2. H Elrick
    3. LH Storms
    2003 Birthweight, rapid growth, cancer, and longevity: a review 95 Journal of the National Medical Association
30. 1. E Solazzo
    2. R Bianconi
    3. G Pirovano
    4. V Matthias
    5. R Vautard
    6. MD Moran
    7. K Wyat Appel
    8. B Bessagnet
    9. J Brandt
    10. JH Christensen
    11. C Chemel
    12. I Coll
    13. J Ferreira
    14. R Forkel
    15. XV Francis
    16. G Grell
    17. P Grossi
    18. AB Hansen
    19. AI Miranda
    20. U Nopmongcol
    21. M Prank
    22. KN Sartelet
    23. M Schaap
    24. JD Silver
    25. RS Sokhi
    26. J Vira
    27. J Werhahn
    28. R Wolke
    29. G Yarwood
    30. J Zhang
    31. ST Rao
    32. S Galmarini
    2012 Operational model evaluation for particulate matter in Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII 53 Atmospheric Environment 75 92
31. 1. JD Stowell
    2. G Geng
    3. E Saikawa
    4. HH Chang
    5. J Fu
    6. C-E Yang
    7. Q Zhu
    8. Y Liu
    9. MJ Strickland
    2019 Associations of wildfire smoke PM2.5 exposure with cardiorespiratory events in Colorado 2011-2014 133 Environment International
32. 1. MR Turetsky
    2. ES Kane
    3. JW Harden
    4. RD Ottmar
    5. KL Manies
    6. E Hoy
    7. ES Kasischke
    2010 Recent acceleration of biomass burning and carbon losses in alaskan forests and peatlands 4 Nature Geoscience 27 31
33. 1. GR Werf
    2. JT Randerson
    3. L Giglio
    4. GJ Collatz
    5. M Mu
    6. PS Kasibhatla
    7. DC Morton
    8. RS DeFries
    9. Y Jin
    10. TT Leeuwen
    2010 Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009 10 Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 11707 11735
34. 1. A Donkelaar
    2. RV Martin
    3. M Brauer
    4. NC Hsu
    5. RA Kahn
    6. RC Levy
    7. A Lyapustin
    8. AM Sayer
    9. DM Winker
    2016 Global estimates of fine particulate matter using a combined geophysical-statistical method with information from satellites, models, and monitors 50 Environmental Science & Technology 3762 3772
35. 1. World Health organization
    2017 Global targets 2025 to improve maternal, infant and young children nutrition https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259188
36. 1. R Xu
    2. P Yu
    3. MJ Abramson
    4. FH Johnston
    5. JM Samet
    6. ML Bell
    7. A Haines
    8. KL Ebi
    9. S Li
    10. Y Guo
    2020 Wildfires, global climate change, and human health 383 The New England Journal of Medicine 2173 2181
37. 1. T Xue
    2. T Zhu
    3. G Geng
    4. Q Zhang
    2019 Association between pregnancy loss and ambient PM2·5 using survey data in Africa: a longitudinal case-control study, 1998-2016 3 The Lancet. Planetary Health
38. 1. T Xue
    2. G Geng
    3. Y Han
    4. H Wang
    5. J Li
    6. H Li
    7. Y Zhou
    8. T Zhu
    2021 Open fire exposure increases the risk of pregnancy loss in South Asia 12 Nature Communications 1 10
39. 1. T Xue
    2. G Geng
    3. J Li
    4. Y Han
    5. Q Guo
    6. FJ Kelly
    7. MJ Wooster
    8. H Wang
    9. B Jiangtulu
    10. X Duan
    11. B Wang
    12. T Zhu
    2021 Associations between exposure to landscape fire smoke and child mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: A matched case-control study 5 The Lancet. Planetary Health
40. 1. T Xue
    2. T Guan
    3. G Geng
    4. Q Zhang
    5. Y Zhao
    6. T Zhu
    2021 Estimation of pregnancy losses attributable to exposure to ambient fine particles in South Asia: An epidemiological case-control study 5 The Lancet. Planetary Health
41. 1. T Ye
    2. Y Guo
    3. G Chen
    4. X Yue
    5. R Xu
    6. M Coêlho
    7. PHN Saldiva
    8. Q Zhao
    9. S Li
    2021 Risk and burden of hospital admissions associated with wildfire-related PM2·5 in Brazil, 2000-15: a nationwide time-series study 5 The Lancet. Planetary Health
42. 1. H Zhang
    2. J Wang
    3. LC García
    4. C Ge
    5. T Plessel
    6. J Szykman
    7. TL Spero
    2020 Improving surface pm2. 5 forecasts in the United States using an ensemble of chemical transport model outputs: 1 125 Bias Correction With Surface Observations in Nonrural Areas. J Journal of Geophysical Research